Skip to content

Various refractive error related case studies

Myopia Case 1

A 24-year-old male myope, in spite of seeing reasonably well at distance without correction, is “soaking in” minus spherical power during subjective refraction, as he prefers higher power when he reads the acuity chart. Why is this occurring, in spite of him seeing reasonably well at distance as well as what can be done to establish if it is needed?
It is important, when performing subjective refraction, to be concerned about giving the patient excessive minus spherical correction. Over-minusing happens as an outcome of the person accommodating throughout the refraction. This is particularly a worry about a more youthful patient due to the fact that a young adult has a large amount of accommodative capability. There is a propensity for the added minus power to be preferred by the patient because the letters on the acuity chart will look smaller as well as darker and also, hence, “better.”
There are several methods that can be used to attempt to stop over-minusing during subjective refraction:
▸ The patient must be instructed, as well as advised, to contrast only the clarity of the choices being shown. It ought to be stressed that if a given option just makes the letters smaller sized as well as darker, it must be thought about as “the same.”
▸ The refractionist needs to make certain the added minus is leading to enhanced capability to review the acuity chart.
▸ Fogging techniques can be employed so that the patient is moving from a position of extra plus.

▸ The red-green duo chrome test can be made use of.
▸ A cycloplegic refraction can be carried out.
Myopia Case 2
A 75-year-old woman is found to have a -1.00 diopter change in refractive error in each eye from the prescription of 1 year earlier. What are the possible etiologies of this myopic shift? What are the factors to consider prior to giving her a prescription for a new pair of glasses incorporating this near-sighted shift?
Feasible etiologies or possible diagnoses consist of the onset or worsening of control of diabetes mellitus, nuclear sclerotic cataract, some medications (e.g., tetracycline, topiramate), hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and also a current scleral clasp.
If it is determined that the near-sighted shift is because of a cataract, it needs to be explained to her that the change in prescription will certainly balance out, however not conquer, the cataract (unless it is very moderate).
The change in prescription measured should be revealed to her binocularly at distance and also near. A choice will need to be made, with the patient, whether the modification will permit sufficient efficiency of tasks of daily living.
If, after a conversation, it is unclear whether the vision will or will not be satisfying with the brand-new prescription, it is often best to make the change. This way, both you and also the patient will understand that if there is continued difficulty while wearing the new prescription, cataract surgery is indeed indicated.
If it is identified that the near-sighted change has risen from diabetic issues, it is normally best to remeasure once the sugar level is stabilized.
If a systemic drug is thought about to be the etiology of the myopic shift, a decision about changing the glasses will depend upon the amount of time the individual is anticipated to be on the drug. Discussion with the prescribing doctor is at times very handy.
Myopia Case 3
A 48-year-old male myope, without separate reading glasses or a bifocal, is having no problem reading. Why? (He is absolutely at the age one would anticipate him to have symptomatic presbyopia).
If he is putting on glasses for myopia, likely his short-sighted refractive error is not fully remedied. He can read at near due to the near-sightedness that stays uncorrected.
In this situation, if the person feels he is seeing satisfactorily at distance and near, it is commonly best to not give the extra minus to completely fix the distance refractive error, letting him use his own accommodative power. Keeping him “under-minused” permits him to delay moving to a bifocal or progressive addition lens (PAL) for a little while. If he were to be offered the full myopic prescription, probably a bifocal or PAL would certainly be required.
If he is not seeing adequately at distance, then the complete myopic prescription can be provided, with the addition of a bifocal or PAL. The decision about when to no longer utilize a single-vision lens is ideally made with the patient.

An extension of this principle can be seen in people with near-sightedness that take off their glasses to read. They are reading with what can be termed their “all-natural near-sightedness.”
Myopia Case 4
A 37-year-old woman myope seeing well at distance with her glasses is having trouble reading. Is this presbyopia?
For somebody 37 years of age, presbyopia is not the most likely medical diagnosis. It is far more likely she is over-minused at distance. Her trouble reading is, most probably, the outcome of having to utilize her accommodative capacity to counter the excessive minus in her glasses. She, consequently, does not have sufficient accommodation left to utilize for reading.
Let the patient recognize that the new glasses you will certainly be recommending, with much less minus sphere, may need a little modification period for seeing clearly at distance, as the accommodative tone might take a little time to relax.
Myopia Case 5
A 55-year-old man with high myopia presents for regular tests. You identify that he does not require a change in glasses as his eyes are in exceptional health. When going over those results, what else should you tell him?
Because a patient with high myopia has actually a raised risk of a retinal tear and subsequent detachment, it is important to advise him to call immediately if he starts to have the onset of new floaters, flashes, or a change in side vision. This advice ought to be repeated and reinforced when you see him in the future.
Myopia Case 6
A 30-year-old woman who has never ever worn glasses is tested and found to have a small amount of near-sightedness. She claims she does not feel she requires distance glasses. Should you prescribe them?
If she feels she is seeing sufficiently at distance and you have actually found only a little myopic change, it is fine for her to continue to work without distance glasses.
Were you to prescribe the glasses for her, the appropriate instructions would certainly be that they do not need to be worn all the time – only when she needs their assistance. She has actually suggested it is unlikely she would use them, so it would possibly be an unnecessary expenditure.
Myopia Case 7
A 35-year-old man putting on glasses for myopia is analyzed, as well as you gauge a really slight increase in his short-sightedness improvement. Should you make the change?
The most effective means to establish if this adjustment should be made is to show it to him and allow him decide whether he feels it is a substantial enough improvement to call for the purchase of a brand-new pair of glasses.
This is a good rule-of-thumb to comply with for any type of anticipated adjustment in prescription.


Hyperopia Case 1
A 37-year-old man with a brand-new, single-vision, hyperopic correction in his glasses is seeing well at distance, yet is having trouble reading. Is this presbyopia?
He most likely has hyperopia that is not being totally fixed by his glasses. He is, as a result, using his accommodative ability to correct the uncorrected hyperopia, leaving an insufficient quantity of accommodation for reading.
When measuring to uncover latent hyperopia, one might perform a cycloplegic refraction or “push plus.” The latter is accomplished through a noncycloplegic refraction by giving as much plus spherical power as the individual will endure without causing blurring or pain. (See Hyperopia Case 3).
Latent hyperopia can (not rarely) be present in people that see well at distance without glasses as well as are not known to be hyperopic.
Hyperopia Case 2
A 50-year-old female that has actually never ever required distance glasses and also is efficiently using non-prescription (OTC) reading glasses is now beginning to have difficulty with distance vision. Why, and also what might you suggest?
Her difficulty at distance is probably because of latent hyperopia that has now come to be apparent. Before age 50 years, she was able to utilize her accommodative ability to fix her distance vision, now there is insufficient accommodation left do so.
If she does not desire a bifocal or PAL and does not mind having two sets of glasses, there is an affordable way to remedy her vision for distance as well as near. If she has a low as well as symmetrical quantity of hyperopia, with no astigmatism, she can use OTC reading glasses for distance. As an example, she might do well in utilizing a +1.00 pair for distance and a +3.00 set for near.
Hyperopia Case 3
A 25-year-old male found to have latent hyperopia was lately offered a glasses prescription following a cycloplegic refraction. He is now complaining that he cannot endure the new glasses. What should be done?
He needs to return for a post-cycloplegic refraction.
If a considerable amount of plus sphere, not previously worn, is found on a cycloplegic refraction, it is best to bring the patient back for a post-cycloplegic refraction before putting together the last prescription. The objective is to identify how much of the complete cycloplegic refraction can be endured.
A smaller amount than the full hyperopic correction might require to be recommended at first due to the fact that the enduring accommodative tone, which has been used to self-correct the latent hyperopia, can be resistant to relaxation. In time, this tone will certainly decrease and also, ultimately, additional plus can be included in stages until the full hyperopic correction is approved. (See Hyperopia Case 1).
Hyperopia Case 4
A 64-year-old female returns for her annual check-up and is found to have actually developed a hyperopic change in her prescription. What are the 2 possible etiologies?
1. Macular edema
2. Recent initiation of treatment, or treatment modification, for diabetic issues that had earlier triggered a near-sighted shift (currently turned around)
Hyperopia Case 5
A 6-year-old female child is taken a look at and found to have a refractive error of +1.25 in each eye. Should glasses be provided?
Because of her young age, and also if strabismus is not an aspect, glasses should not be given for this refractive error. She has sufficient accommodation to remedy the hyperopia, and also it will be invoked without any conscious effort.
It is additionally not needed to provide a correction for a small amount of astigmatism at this age.


Astigmatism Case 1
A 35-year-old male patient calls, having simply started wearing the new glasses you recommended.
His previous prescription: OD -2.25 + 1.00 × 90 °
OS -2.00 + 1.00 × 90 °
The new prescription that you gave to him is: OD -2.50 + 1.75 × 75 °
OS -1.75+ 1.50 × 105 °
He states that, with the new glasses, the top of his desk looks slanted as well as, when walking, he has some nausea and also the flooring seems to be rising.
What is the most likely source of his symptoms?
The symptoms are almost certainly because of the change made in the astigmatism correction in the new prescription.
The astigmatic part of a glasses prescription is the most susceptible to trigger a problem. An adjustment in cylinder axis, especially with greater cylinder powers, is constantly a problem. A “trial run” before prescribing might very well have avoided his issues.

Astigmatism Case 2
A 34-year-old female, at the phoropter, is starting subjective refraction with the following prescription in one of her eyes: -3.50 + 0.50 × 180 °
The spherical improvement in Step 1 is identified to be -3.00, and in Step 2, the axis remains unmodified.

You start changing the cylinder power of +0.50 × 180 ° with the Jackson cross cylinder, and she says the option with the red dot is clearer. For that reason, you minimize the cylinder power to +0.25 × 180 °
On the next visit, she once more selects the red dot as well as you minimize the cylinder power to 0.00 × 180 °, and also include +0.25 power to the spherical.
On the following series of choices she once again chooses the red dot, and you are left with no more room as you are already working with plus cylinder and also cannot go any lower. In this case, what can you do?
The patient is picking less plus cylinder power when the cylinder power is currently at 0 and consequently cannot go any lower. This predicament is resolved by recognizing that the patient is actually picking plus cylinder power 90 degrees away. In this case, transform the axis from 180 degrees to 90 degrees, dial in +0.50 diopter of cylinder power at 90 degrees, change the sphere by 0.25 diopter, and afterwards begin again to fine-tune cylinder axis as well as power. (See the Rule listed below).
The Rule: If a patient chooses “less than 0” cylinder power, the axis ought to be shifted 90 degrees from its existing place. This puts on both the plus and also minus cylinder methods.
Astigmatism Case 3
A 25-year-old female myope, who formerly had a small amount of astigmatism, is picking a huge amount of plus cylinder power during subjective refraction, in spite of the earlier low astigmatism. Why may this be the case?
It may be that there has merely been a rise in astigmatism, the most obvious choice or a corneal issue such as keratoconus could be the cause. Nevertheless, it is necessary to ensure this is not the result of over-minusing the spherical, which will necessitate a rise in cylinder power.
For each 0.50 diopter an individual with plus cylinder is over-minused, the cylinder power needs to be raised by 1 diopter to keep the spherical equivalent as well as keep the circle of least confusion (which is a physics term and is defined as the minimum cross section of a symmetrical bundle of rays that have no common focus because of spherical aberration).on the retina.

For instance, if a person has a real refractive error of -3.50 +0.50 × 180 °, the spherical matching of the right prescription is -3.25.
If the sphere is over-minused by -0.50 diopter (to -4.00), the individual will certainly pick an increase in cylinder power of +1.00 diopter (to +1.50), with a resulting spherical matching of -3.25.
The raised cylinder power will be chosen since letters will appear most clear at the spherical equivalent.
This causes a measured modification of -4.00 +1.50 × 180 °
In recap, over-minusing the sphere results in a wrong measurement of cylinder power.
Conversely, if sphere is over-minused in the minus cylinder method, the patient will certainly choose much less than true cylinder power.
Astigmatism Case 4
A 45-year-old, newly presbyopic male is checked up as well as found to have, in each eye, a distance refractive modification of plano +0.50 × 90 ° and also a near improvement of +1.50 +0.50 × 90 °. He has never had distance glasses and his only problem is with reading. What should you provide?
If he feels he is seeing fine at distance and also would just like help with reading, he might do rather well with OTC reading glasses. A strength of +1.75 would certainly be suggested based on the spherical equivalent of the near measurement. It is not necessary to provide a prescription incorporating the astigmatism improvement unless his reading or distance acuity is significantly enhanced with the addition of the cylinder, and he wants it.
Astigmatism Case 5
A 14-year-old female, who has actually not had a previous refraction, complains of trouble seeing at distance. Subjective refraction results in the following prescription:
OD -1.75 + 0.50 × 100 ° VA 20/20.
OS -1.50 sphere VA 20/25 (pinhole 20/20)
No organic etiology is found to discuss the minimal acuity in the left eye.
What should be the next step?
Due to the fact that the astigmatic improvement for an individual is commonly symmetrical, a helpful following step would certainly be to look for that opportunity. Complete proportion would certainly indicate a refractive error for the left eye of -1.75 + 0.50 × 80 °. When balanced, the axes add to 180 degrees. Repeat subjective refraction for the left eye could begin keeping that prescription, and also note that the correction originally found is the spherical equivalent of the new beginning point.


Presbyopia Case 1
A 45-year-old female presents with the problem when trying to read, “My arms aren’t long enough.”
What is the diagnosis as well as what should you prescribe?
Her symptom is the outcome of presbyopia.
The individual’s age is 45 years. This is normally when the preliminary correction of presbyopia is necessary, not age 40 years as is typically stated. If presbyopic symptoms happen before age 45 years, make certain the individual is not over-minused or a latent hyperope. These may be the source of the earlier-than-usual beginning of presbyopic symptoms. On the other hand, if a person reads adequately without corrected in the late 40s, it is highly likely some uncorrected myopia is present.
The treatment for presbyopia would seem to be very easy, yet surprisingly there are four categories of solutions, and added options within the solutions.
The four solutions are as follows:
1. Provide nothing: If she has mild-to-moderate near-sightedness and has been taking her distance glasses off for reading, it is great to have her continue to do so. When the glasses are off, she is reading with her “natural near-sightedness.”.
2. Provide reading glasses: She can be given a prescription for reading glasses or, if ideal, advised to buy OTC reading glasses.
Three points to consider with regard to OTC reading glasses:
a. OTC reading glasses are often referred to as drugstore reading glasses, readers, cheaters, or magnifiers. Although OTC reading glasses are called magnifiers, their objective is not magnifying. Their function is to supplement the person’s lessened focusing capacity. That focusing ability, before it was lost, focused the print but did not expand it.
The appropriate strength for OTC reading glasses is established by discovering the quantity of plus power that best focuses on the reading material without magnifying it. The point to refrain from giving added plus power, which would produce magnification, is that it would cause a needlessly closer and narrower reading range. An exemption to this is for a patient with low vision where magnification is purposely given.
b. OTC reading glasses are suitable when 3 criteria are met:
♦ The individual needs to be essentially emmetropic at distance. (If glasses are worn to fix a distance refractive error, an Add is usually recommended).
♦ Both eyes have to be sensibly in proportion in their refractive status. OTC reading glasses have the very same strength lens for each eye.
♦ The patient must have no astigmatism, or an irrelevant quantity. OTC reading glasses have spherical plus power only, without any cylinder correction for astigmatism.
When these 3 criteria are satisfied, OTC reading glasses can be recommended with self-confidence. The strength description founed on the glasses can be relied upon, the quality of the lenses is good, and there is a considerable cost saving for the patient.
c. Three kinds of OTC reading glasses are made, as well as it is handy to review with the patient the advantages and disadvantages of each type to figure out which is likely to work best:
♦ Half-glasses:
Pro: Allows for distance vision over the top of the glasses
Con: Some individuals choose to not have this style.
♦ Complete reading glasses:
Pro: Gives the individual a larger reading area than the half-glasses.
Con: The glasses need to be removed for distance viewing.
♦ Plano bifocals (plano at top; flat-top bifocal at base):
Pro: Allows the patient to alternating in between distance and near.
Con: Some individuals choose to not have glasses.
It is practical to make a note of for the patient the strength and type of reading glasses picked. When doing so, it is best to compose “OTC” clearly on the prescription to avoid confusion if it is taken to an optical shop.
3. Offer two pairs of glasses, one for distance and one for near: This choice might be specifically ideal if distance glasses are used only for certain tasks, such as driving. The patient might after that choose to have different distance as well as reading glasses, utilizing each set when suitable.
This choice is most likely not best if somebody, at the workplace or residence, has a demand to often alternate vision from distance to near as well as the other way around. This would certainly demand a cumbersome amount of changing in between both pairs.
2 sets of glasses may also be favored by a patient who is excessively worried about using a bifocal. A brand-new presbyope may often pick to begin with different reading glasses because of this, understanding an adjustment to a bifocal or progressive addition lenses (PAL) can be made if changing to and fro in between both sets of glasses is occurring too often.
4. Offer bifocal or multifocal glasses: This choice functions best for most people as it is the easiest and also most efficient means for the presbyope to have actually best remedied vision both at distance and near. In life, we are regularly alternating our look from far to near, along with intermediate. Teachers are a prime example since they frequently need to read and look out at a class of pupils in the very same setting. Likewise, some people like to sit as well as concurrently read or knit while watching TV.
It is good to be conscious that, for some individuals, the initial prescription of a bifocal is a reason for fear and even mild distress. Some are concerned about getting used to them, while others consider it an unpleasant indication that they are aging. If these worries are found, a little peace of mind can be rather valuable.
It is very important to talk with the person that there are 3 main means a presbyopic Add can be offered. It can be offered as a basic bifocal, a trifocal, or a PAL, the latter occasionally described as a no-line bifocal. It is best to review the advantages and disadvantages of each of these options with the patient to determine which is most proper.
The conventional bifocal has a line as well as may be offered as a flat-top section or, much less usually, as an exec bifocal. In the latter, the bifocal segment inhabits the entire lower section of the lens. The intermediate distance is not dealt with by a basic bifocal.
The trifocal has three unique sections, with two separating lines. The third (center) lens fixes the intermediate range. Voids in between distance and also intermediate, along with between intermediate as well as near, do exist. The trifocal is suggested with a lot less frequency since the PAL is readily available.
The PAL is a finished multifocal. Plus power increases progressively from the distance portion at the top of the lens to be able to see at distance to the full strength Add at the bottom for near tasks like reading. This lens enables one to concentrate from distance to near, with no spaces, by looking even more down the lens.
It is very important to let the patient recognize that, when a dynamic lens is working correctly, distance vision ought to be clear when she or he is looking straight in front, near vision should be clear when he or she is looking down in the usual reading setting, and it is just in the intermediate location where some modification with chin-up placing needs to be made. The closer the object, the higher the chin requires to be. After a short while, placing for the intermediate range ought to happen essentially automatically.
The great benefit of the PAL is that it permits clear vision at all distances, enabling one to function extremely closely to just how one did prior to the onset of presbyopia!
It requires to be mentioned to the patient that there is a fundamental blur at the sides with the PAL. This does necessitate straight-ahead seeing for a lot of points, especially reading. A lot of patients have the ability to get used to this easily as now motion of the head is necessary as one reads across a page as opposed to moving just one’s eyes. Of note, the free-form dynamic lens has actually significantly boosted side vision in the PAL.

What next?

After reviewing this, you might still have great deals of concerns regarding your eye treatments. If this is you, then why not reserve your position by calling up Dr Rajesh Khanna at Khanna Vision Institute, Westlake Village/ Beverly Hills or even visiting us to raise any type of concerns you might have, or book an assessment to obtain one-to-one guidance on treatment choices from, among our specialists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.